President Barack Obama ’s explanation of why he can continue the U.S. mission in Libya without lawmakers’ approval didn’t immediately satisfy critics in Congress, and legal scholars were divided over how the law should be interpreted. The administration said yesterday in a 32-page unclassified ...
Related News:-
White House Says War Powers Limits Don’t Apply to ...
White House Says War Powers Limits Don’t Apply to Libya Mission June 16, 2011, 12:18 AM EDT
White House Says War Powers Limits Don’t Apply to ...
ABC News White House Says War Powers Limits Don't Apply to Libya Mission BusinessWeek “The creative arguments made by the White House raise a number of questions that must ...
Administration Argues War Powers Limits Don’t ...
... Argues War Powers Limits Don’t Apply to Libya ... Libya Mission Will Violate War Powers June 19, Boehner Says ... confident the White House ...
John Boehner's War Powers Act flip flop - Blogrunner
... Obama Says War Powers Act Doesn’t Apply To ... White House: War Powers Don’t Apply to Libya Campaign ... the War Powers Resolution does not apply to the mission in Libya, or ...
White House: We are not violating the War Powers ...
FP Passport: Libya conflict is now a “civil war,” says the A.P. ... in this reconfigured mission consistent with the War Powers ... UPDATE: The White House released ...
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS: Boehner pressures Obama on Libya operation
... 90 day time limit in the War Powers ... Suit Over Libya War. We'll see what the White House says ... concluded the War Powers Resolution does not apply to the mission in Libya ...
White House defends legality of Libya mission ...
White House defends legality of Libya mission - Article Comments - View topic ... approval or get out now, don't try to ... He says the War Powers Resolution is Constitution.
White House on War Powers Deadline: 'Limited' US Role in Libya ...
White House on War Powers Deadline: 'Limited' US Role in Libya Means No Need to Get ... supports the U.S. mission in Libya and that ... ranters and ravers who don't agree ...
No comments:
Post a Comment